Paper detail

Quantitative estimates in stochastic homogenization for correlated coefficient fields

This paper is about the homogenization of linear elliptic operators in divergence form with stationary random coefficients that have only slowly decaying correlations. It deduces optimal estimates of the homogenization error from optimal growth estimates of the (extended) corrector. In line with the heuristics, there are transitions at dimension $d=2$, and for a correlation-decay exponent $β=2$; we capture the correct power of logarithms coming from these two sources of criticality. The decay of correlations is sharply encoded in terms of a multiscale logarithmic Sobolev inequality (LSI) for the ensemble under consideration --- the results would fail if correlation decay were encoded in terms of an $α$-mixing condition. Among other ensembles popular in modelling of random media, this class includes coefficient fields that are local transformations of stationary Gaussian fields. The optimal growth of the corrector $ϕ$ is derived from bounding the size of spatial averages $F=\int g\cdot\nablaϕ$ of its gradient. This in turn is done by a (deterministic) sensitivity estimate of $F$, that is, by estimating the functional derivative $\frac{\partial F}{\partial a}$ of $F$ w.~r.~t.~the coefficient field $a$. Appealing to the LSI in form of concentration of measure yields a stochastic estimate on $F$. The sensitivity argument relies on a large-scale Schauder theory for the heterogeneous elliptic operator $-\nabla\cdot a\nabla$. The treatment allows for non-symmetric $a$ and for systems like linear elasticity.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.