Paper detail

Quantitative Assessment of DESIS Hyperspectral Data for Plant Biodiversity Estimation in Australia

Diversity of terrestrial plants plays a key role in maintaining a stable, healthy, and productive ecosystem. Though remote sensing has been seen as a promising and cost-effective proxy for estimating plant diversity, there is a lack of quantitative studies on how confidently plant diversity can be inferred from spaceborne hyperspectral data. In this study, we assessed the ability of hyperspectral data captured by the DLR Earth Sensing Imaging Spectrometer (DESIS) for estimating plant species richness in the Southern Tablelands and Snowy Mountains regions in southeast Australia. Spectral features were firstly extracted from DESIS spectra with principal component analysis, canonical correlation analysis, and partial least squares analysis. Then regression was conducted between the extracted features and plant species richness with ordinary least squares regression, kernel ridge regression, and Gaussian process regression. Results were assessed with the coefficient of correlation ($r$) and Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE), based on a two-fold cross validation scheme. With the best performing model, $r$ is 0.71 and RMSE is 5.99 for the Southern Tablelands region, while $r$ is 0.62 and RMSE is 6.20 for the Snowy Mountains region. The assessment results reported in this study provide supports for future studies on understanding the relationship between spaceborne hyperspectral measurements and terrestrial plant biodiversity.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.