Paper detail

Quantile regression for longitudinal data: unobserved heterogeneity and informative missingness

Linear quantile regression models aim at providing a detailed and robust picture of the (conditional) response distribution as function of a set of observed covariates. Longitudinal data represent an interesting field of application of such models; due to their peculiar features, they represent a substantial challenge, in that the standard, cross-sectional, model representation needs to be extended for dealing with such kind of data. In fact, repeated observations from the same statistical unit poses a problem of dependence; in a conditional perspective, this dependence could be ascribed to sources of unobserved, individual-specific, heterogeneity. Along these lines, quantile regression models have recently been extended to the analysis of longitudinal, continuous, responses, by modelling dependence via time-constant or time-varying random effects. In this manuscript, we introduce a general quantile regression model for longitudinal, continuous, responses where time-varying and time-constant random parameters are jointly taken into account. A further feature of longitudinal designs is the presence of partially incomplete sequences, due to some individuals leaving the study before its designed end. The missing data process may produce a selection of units which can be informative with respect to the parameters of the longitudinal data model. To deal with the case of irretrievable drop-out, we introduce a pattern mixture version of the linear quantile hidden Markov model, where we account for time-varying heterogeneity and for changes in the fixed effect vector due to differential propensities to stay in the study. The proposed models are illustrated using a well known benchmark dataset on longitudinal dynamics of CD4 cells and by means of a large scale simulation study, entailing different quantiles and both complete and partially complete (ie subject to drop-out) individual sequences.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.