Paper detail

Quantifying Heteroskedasticity via Bhattacharyya Distance

Heteroskedasticity is a statistical anomaly that describes differing variances of error terms in a time series dataset. The presence of heteroskedasticity in data imposes serious challenges for forecasting models and many statistical tests are not valid in the presence of heteroskedasticity. Heteroskedasticity of the data affects the relation between the predictor variable and the outcome, which leads to false positive and false negative decisions in the hypothesis testing. Available approaches to study heteroskedasticity thus far adopt the strategy of accommodating heteroskedasticity in the time series and consider it an inevitable source of noise. In these existing approaches, two forecasting models are prepared for normal and heteroskedastic scenarios and a statistical test is to determine whether or not the data is heteroskedastic. This work-in-progress research introduces a quantifying measurement for heteroskedasticity. The idea behind the proposed metric is the fact that a heteroskedastic time series features a uniformly distributed local variances. The proposed measurement is obtained by calculating the local variances using linear time invariant filters. A probability density function of the calculated local variances is then derived and compared to a uniform distribution of theoretical ultimate heteroskedasticity using statistical divergence measurements. The results demonstrated on synthetic datasets shows a strong correlation between the proposed metric and number of variances locally estimated in a heteroskedastic time series.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.