Paper detail

Quantal-classical fluctuation relation and the second law of thermodynamics: The quantum linear oscillator

In this work, we study the fluctuation relation and the second law of thermodynamics within a quantum linear oscillator externally driven over the period of time t = tau. To go beyond the standard approach (the two-point projective measurement one) to this subject and also render it discussed in both quantum and classical domains on the single footing, we recast this standard approach in terms of the Wigner function and its propagator in the phase space (x,p). With the help of the canonical transformation from (x,p) to the angle-action coordinates (ϕ,I), we can then derive a measurement-free (classical-like) form of the Crooks fluctuation relation in the Wigner representation. This enables us to introduce the work W_{I_0,I_{tau}} associated with a single run from (I_0) to (I_{tau}) over the period tau, which is a quantum generalization of the thermodynamic work with its roots in the classical thermodynamics. This quantum work differs from the energy difference e_{I_0,I_{tau}} = e(I_{tau}) - e(I_0) unless beta, hbar --> 0. Consequently, we will obtain the quantum second-law inequality Delta F_{beta} \leq <W>_{P} \leq <e>_{P} = Delta U, where P, Delta F_{beta}, and <W>_P denote the work (quasi)-probability distribution, the free energy difference, and the average work distinguished from the internal energy difference Delta U, respectively, while <W>_P --> Delta U in the limit of beta, hbar --> 0 only. Therefore, we can also introduce the quantum heat Q_q = Delta U - W even for a thermally isolated system, resulting from the quantum fluctuation therein. This is a more fine-grained result than <W>_P = Delta U obtained from the standard approach. Owing to the measurement-free nature of the thermodynamic work W_{I_0,I_{tau}}, our result can also apply to the (non-thermal) initial states rho_0 = (1-gamma) rho_{beta} + gamma sigma with sigma \ne rho_{beta}.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.