Paper detail

Quality assessment for short oligonucleotide microarray data

Quality of microarray gene expression data has emerged as a new research topic. As in other areas, microarray quality is assessed by comparing suitable numerical summaries across microarrays, so that outliers and trends can be visualized, and poor quality arrays or variable quality sets of arrays can be identified. Since each single array comprises tens or hundreds of thousands of measurements, the challenge is to find numerical summaries which can be used to make accurate quality calls. To this end, several new quality measures are introduced based on probe level and probeset level information, all obtained as a by-product of the low-level analysis algorithms RMA/fitPLM for Affymetrix GeneChips. Quality landscapes spatially localize chip or hybridization problems. Numerical chip quality measures are derived from the distributions of Normalized Unscaled Standard Errors and of Relative Log Expressions. Quality of chip batches is assessed by Residual Scale Factors. These quality assessment measures are demonstrated on a variety of datasets (spike-in experiments, small lab experiments, multi-site studies). They are compared with Affymetrix's individual chip quality report.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.