Paper detail

Quadrupole deformation $(β,γ)$ of light $Λ$ hypernuclei in constrained relativistic mean field model: shape evolution and shape polarization effect of $Λ$ hyperon

The shapes of light normal nuclei and $Λ$ hypernuclei are investigated in the $(β, γ)$ deformation plane by using a newly developed constrained relativistic mean field (RMF) model. As examples, the results of some C, Mg, and Si nuclei are presented and discussed in details. We found that for normal nuclei the present RMF calculations and previous Skyrme-Hartree-Fock models predict similar trends of the shape evolution with the neutron number increasing. But some quantitative aspects from these two approaches, such as the depth of the minimum and the softness in the $γ$ direction, differ a lot for several nuclei. For $Λ$ hypernuclei, in most cases, the addition of a $Λ$ hyperon alters slightly the location of the ground state minimum towards the direction of smaller $β$ and softer $γ$ in the potential energy surface $E \sim (β, γ)$. There are three exceptions, namely, $^{13}_Λ$C, $^{23}_Λ$C, and $^{31}_Λ$Si in which the polarization effect of the additional $Λ$ is so strong that the shapes of these three hypernuclei are drastically different from their corresponding core nuclei.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.