Paper detail

QU-net++: Image Quality Detection Framework for Segmentation of Medical 3D Image Stacks

Automated segmentation of pathological regions of interest aids medical image diagnostics and follow-up care. However, accurate pathological segmentations require high quality of annotated data that can be both cost and time intensive to generate. In this work, we propose an automated two-step method that detects a minimal image subset required to train segmentation models by evaluating the quality of medical images from 3D image stacks using a U-net++ model. These images that represent a lack of quality training can then be annotated and used to fully train a U-net-based segmentation model. The proposed QU-net++ model detects this lack of quality training based on the disagreement in segmentations produced from the final two output layers. The proposed model isolates around 10% of the slices per 3D image stack and can scale across imaging modalities to segment cysts in OCT images and ground glass opacity (GGO) in lung CT images with Dice scores in the range 0.56-0.72. Thus, the proposed method can be applied for cost effective multi-modal pathology segmentation tasks.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.