Paper detail

QCD Saturation and $γ^*-γ^*$ Scattering

Two photon collisions at high energy have an important theoretical advantage: the simplicity of the initial state, which gives us a unique opportunity to calculate these processes for large virtualities of both photons in perturbative QCD approach. In this paper we study QCD saturation in two photon collisions in the framework of the Glauber-Mueller approach. The Glauber-Mueller formula is derived emphasizing the impact parameter dependence ($b_t$) of the dipole-dipole amplitude. It is shown that non-perturbative QCD contributions are needed to describe large $b_t $-behaviour, and the way how to deal with them is suggested. Our approach can be viewed as the model for the saturation in which the entire impact parameter dependence is determined by the initial conditions. The unitarity bound for the total cross section, its energy dependence as well aspredictions for future experiments are discussed.It is argued that the total cross section increases faster than any power of $ \log(1/x)$ in a wide range of energy or $x$, namely $σ(γ^*-γ^*) \propto (1/Q^2) exp(a \sqrt{\ln(1/x)}) \leq 1/m^2_π$ where $exp(a \sqrt{\ln(1/x)})$ reflects the $x$ dependence of the gluon density $xG \propto exp(2 a \sqrt{\ln(1/x)})$ and $m_π$ is the pion mass.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.