Paper detail

QBDC: Query by dropout committee for training deep supervised architecture

While the current trend is to increase the depth of neural networks to increase their performance, the size of their training database has to grow accordingly. We notice an emergence of tremendous databases, although providing labels to build a training set still remains a very expensive task. We tackle the problem of selecting the samples to be labelled in an online fashion. In this paper, we present an active learning strategy based on query by committee and dropout technique to train a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). We derive a commmittee of partial CNNs resulting from batchwise dropout runs on the initial CNN. We evaluate our active learning strategy for CNN on MNIST benchmark, showing in particular that selecting less than 30 % from the annotated database is enough to get similar error rate as using the full training set on MNIST. We also studied the robustness of our method against adversarial examples.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.