Paper detail

Purely singular splittings of cyclic groups

Let $G$ be a finite abelian group. We say that $M$ and $S$ form a \textsl{splitting} of $G$ if every nonzero element $g$ of $G$ has a unique representation of the form $g=ms$ with $m\in M$ and $s\in S$, while $0$ has no such representation. The splitting is called \textit{purely singular} if for each prime divisor $p$ of $|G|$, there is at least one element of $M$ is divisible by $p$. In this paper, we mainly study the purely singular splittings of cyclic groups. We first prove that if $k\ge3$ is a positive integer such that $[-k+1, \,k]^*$ splits a cyclic group $\mathbb{Z}_m$, then $m=2k$. Next, we have the following general result. Suppose $M=[-k_1, \,k_2]^*$ splits $\mathbb{Z}_{n(k_1+k_2)+1}$ with $1\leq k_1< k_2$. If $n\geq 2$, then $k_1\leq n-2$ and $k_2\leq 2n-5$. Applying this result, we prove that if $M=[-k_1, \,k_2]^*$ splits $\mathbb{Z}_m$ purely singularly, and either $(i)$ $\gcd(s, \,m)=1$ for all $s\in S$ or $(ii)$ $m=2^αp^β$ or $2^αp_1p_2$ with $α\geq 0$, $β\geq 1$ and $p$, $p_1$, $p_2$ odd primes, then $m=k_1+k_2+1$ or $k_1=0$ and $m=k_2+1$ or $2k_2+1$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.