Paper detail

Pseudorapidity dependence of the $p_T$ spectra of charged hadrons in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 0.9 and 2.36 TeV

We report the predictions of different Monte Carlo event generators including HIJING, Pythia, and QGSJETII in comparison with the experimental data measured by the CMS Collaboration at CERN in proton-proton ($pp$) collisions at center-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}$ = 0.9 and 2.36 TeV. The CMS experimental transverse momentum ($p_T$ or $p_{\perp}$) spectra of charged hadrons were measured for pseudorapidity range 0 $\le$ $η$ $\le$ 2.4 with bin width of $η$ = 0.2 (for $p_T$ from 0.1 to 2 GeV/$c$) and a single bin of $η$ for $\lvert$$η$$\rvert$ $<$ 2.4 (for $p_T$ from 0.1 to 4 GeV/$c$). Pythia reproduced the $p_T$ spectra with reasonable agreement for most of the $p_T$ range. It depicts better results in the case of the $|η|<$ 2.4 than HIJING and QGSJETII which could reproduce the spectra in a limited $p_T$ range. Furthermore, to analyze the $p_T$ spectra of charged hadrons measured by the CMS Collaboration, we used a three component function (structured from the Boltzmann distribution) and the $q$-dual function (from the $q$-dual statistics) to extract parameter values relevant for the study of bulk properties of hadronic matter at high energy. We have also applied the two analytic functions over the model predictions. The values extracted by the functions from the HIJING and Pythia models are closer to the experimental data than the QGSJETII model. Although the models could reproduce the $p_T$ spectra of all charged particles in some of the $p_T$ range but none of them could reproduce the distributions over the entire $p_T$ range and in all the pseudorapidity regions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.