Paper detail

Pseudo Label Is Better Than Human Label

State-of-the-art automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems are trained with tens of thousands of hours of labeled speech data. Human transcription is expensive and time consuming. Factors such as the quality and consistency of the transcription can greatly affect the performance of the ASR models trained with these data. In this paper, we show that we can train a strong teacher model to produce high quality pseudo labels by utilizing recent self-supervised and semi-supervised learning techniques. Specifically, we use JUST (Joint Unsupervised/Supervised Training) and iterative noisy student teacher training to train a 600 million parameter bi-directional teacher model. This model achieved 4.0% word error rate (WER) on a voice search task, 11.1% relatively better than a baseline. We further show that by using this strong teacher model to generate high-quality pseudo labels for training, we can achieve 13.6% relative WER reduction (5.9% to 5.1%) for a streaming model compared to using human labels.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.