Paper detail

PSCNN: A 885.86 TOPS/W Programmable SRAM-based Computing-In-Memory Processor for Keyword Spotting

Computing-in-memory (CIM) has attracted significant attentions in recent years due to its massive parallelism and low power consumption. However, current CIM designs suffer from large area overhead of small CIM macros and bad programmablity for model execution. This paper proposes a programmable CIM processor with a single large sized CIM macro instead of multiple smaller ones for power efficient computation and a flexible instruction set to support various binary 1-D convolution Neural Network (CNN) models in an easy way. Furthermore, the proposed architecture adopts the pooling write-back method to support fused or independent convolution/pooling operations to reduce 35.9\% of latency, and the flexible ping-pong feature SRAM to fit different feature map sizes during layer-by-layer execution.The design fabricated in TSMC 28nm technology achieves 150.8 GOPS throughput and 885.86 TOPS/W power efficiency at 10 MHz when executing our binary keyword spotting model, which has higher power efficiency and flexibility than previous designs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.