Paper detail

Protected nodal electron pocket from multiple-Q ordering in underdoped high temperature superconductors

A multiple wavevector (Q) reconstruction of the Fermi surface is shown to yield a profoundly different electronic structure to that characteristic of single wavevector reconstruction, despite their proximity in energy. We consider the specific case in which ordering is generated by Qx = [2πa, 0] and Qy = [0,2πb] (in which a = b = 1/4) - similar to those identified in neutron diffraction and scanning tunneling microscopy experiments, and more generally show that an isolated pocket adjacent to the nodal point knodal = [\pm π/2, \pm π/2] is a protected feature of such a multiple-Q model, potentially corresponding to the nodal 'Fermi arcs' observed in photoemission and the small size of the electronic heat capacity found in high magnetic fields - importantly, containing electron carriers which can yield negative Hall and Seebeck coefficients observed in high magnetic fields.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.