Paper detail

Prospects and requirements of opaque detectors in accelerator neutrino experiments

Opaque detectors are a recently proposed novel detector concept where an opaque scintillator aligned with wavelength-shifting fibers is used to enable the discrimination of electron neutrinos and antineutrinos with a rather low energy threshold. In this work, we investigate the potential effects of the enhanced detection capabilities of the opaque detectors in accelerator neutrino experiments. Focusing on the energy threshold, energy resolution, detection efficiency and background suppression in the analysis of electron-like events, we determine whether using opaque detectors could lead to improvements in the CP violation and light sterile neutrino searches in the future accelerator neutrino experiments. We also identify the minimum requirements for the opaque detectors to reach the designated physics goals in the simulated experiments. We find that a 75.6% fraction of $δ_{CP}$ values could be reached for CP violation discovery by 3$σ$ confidence level or better when opaque detectors of 120 kton and 130 kton fiducial masses are used together with neutrino beams from J-PARC and MOMENT, respectively, whereas near detectors placed about 250 m from sources are sufficient to exclude the gallium anomaly at 2$σ$ confidence level.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.