Paper detail

Proportions of Cyclic Matrices in Maximal Reducible Matrix Groups and Algebras

A matrix is said to be {\it cyclic} if its characteristic polynomial is equal to its minimal polynomial. Cyclic matrices play an important role in some algorithms for matrix group computation, such as the Cyclic Meataxe developed by P. M. Neumann and C. E. Praeger in 1999. In that year also, G. E. Wall and J. E. Fulman independently found the limiting proportion of cyclic matrices in general linear groups over a finite field of fixed order q as the dimension n approaches infinity, namely $(1-q^{-5}) \prod_{i=3}^\infty (1-q^{-i}) = 1 - q^{-3} + O(q^{-4}).$ We study cyclic matrices in a maximal reducible matrix group or algebra, that is, in the largest subgroup or subalgebra that leaves invariant some proper nontrivial subspace. We modify Wall's generating function approach to determine the limiting proportions of cyclic matrices in maximal reducible matrix groups and algebras over a field of order q, as the dimension of the underlying vector space increases while that of the invariant subspace remains fixed. The limiting proportion in a maximal reducible group is proved to be $1 - q^{-2} + O(q^{-3})$; note the change of the exponent of q in the second term of the expansion. Moreover, we exhibit in each maximal reducible matrix group a family of noncyclic matrices whose proportion is $q^{-2} + O(q^{-3})$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.