Paper detail

Projected sensitivity of the LUX-ZEPLIN experiment to the $0νββ$ decay of $^{136}$Xe

The LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment will enable a neutrinoless double beta decay search in parallel to the main science goal of discovering dark matter particle interactions. We report the expected LZ sensitivity to $^{136}$Xe neutrinoless double beta decay, taking advantage of the significant ($>$600 kg) $^{136}$Xe mass contained within the active volume of LZ without isotopic enrichment. After 1000 live-days, the median exclusion sensitivity to the half-life of $^{136}$Xe is projected to be 1.06$\times$10$^{26}$ years (90% confidence level), similar to existing constraints. We also report the expected sensitivity of a possible subsequent dedicated exposure using 90% enrichment with $^{136}$Xe at 1.06$\times$10$^{27}$ years.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
D. S. AkeribC. W. AkerlofA. AlqahtaniS. K. AlsumT. J. AndersonN. AngelidesH. M. AraújoJ. E. ArmstrongM. ArthursX. BaiJ. BalajthyS. BalashovJ. BangA. BaxterJ. BensingerE. P. BernardA. BernsteinA. BhattiA. BiekertT. P. BiesiadzinskiH. J. BirchK. E. BoastB. BoxerP. BrásJ. H. BuckleyV. V. BugaevS. BurdinJ. K. BusenitzR. CabritaC. CarelsD. L. CarlsmithM. C. Carmona BenitezM. CascellaC. ChanN. I. ChottA. ColeA. CottleJ. E. CutterC. E. DahlL. de ViveirosJ. E. Y. DobsonE. DruszkiewiczT. K. EdbergS. R. EriksenA. FanS. FiorucciH. FlaecherE. D. FraserT. FruthR. J. GaitskellJ. GenovesiC. GhagE. GibsonM. G. D. GilchrieseS. GokhaleM. G. D. van der GrintenC. R. HallA. HarrisonS. J. HaselschwardtS. A. HertelJ. YK. HorM. HornD. Q. HuangC. M. IgnarraO. JahangirW. JiJ. JohnsonA. C. KabothA. C. KamahaK. KamdinK. KazkazD. KhaitanA. KhazovI. KhuranaC. D. KocherL. KorleyE. V. KorolkovaJ. KrasH. KrausS. KravitzL. KreczkoB. KriklerV. A. KudryavtsevE. A. LeasonJ. LeeD. S. LeonardK. T. LeskoC. LevyJ. LiJ. LiaoF. T. LiaoJ. LinA. LindoteR. LinehanW. H. LippincottR. LiuX. LiuC. LoniewskiM. I. LopesB. López ParedesW. LorenzonS. LuitzJ. M. LyleP. A. MajewskiA. ManalaysayL. ManentiR. L. ManninoN. MarangouM. F. MarzioniD. N. McKinseyJ. McLaughlinY. MengE. H. MillerE. MizrachiA. MonteM. E. MonzaniJ. A. MoradE. MorrisonB. J. MountA. St. J. MurphyD. NaimA. NaylorC. NedlikC. NehrkornH. N. NelsonF. NevesJ. A. NikoleyczikA. NilimaK. O'SullivanI. OlcinaK. C. Oliver-MalloryS. PalK. J. PalladinoJ. PalmerN. ParveenE. K. PeaseB. PenningG. PereiraK. PushkinJ. ReichenbacherC. A. RhyneQ. RiffardG. R. C. RischbieterR. RoseroP. RossiterG. RutherfordD. SantoneA. B. M. R. SazzadR. W. SchneeM. SchubnellD. SeymourS. ShawT. A. ShuttJ. J. SilkC. SilvaR. SmithM. SolmazV. N. SolovovP. SorensenI. StancuA. StevensK. StifterT. J. SumnerN. SwansonM. SzydagisM. TanW. C. TaylorR. TaylorD. J. TemplesP. A. TermanD. R. TiedtM. TimalsinaA. TomásM. TripathiD. R. TronstadW. TurnerL. TvrznikovaU. UtkuA. VacheretA. VaitkusJ. J. WangW. WangJ. R. WatsonR. C. WebbR. G. WhiteT. J. WhitisF. L. H. WolfsD. WoodwardX. XiangJ. XuM. YehP. Zarzhitsky
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

D. S. AkeribC. W. AkerlofA. AlqahtaniS. K. AlsumT. J. AndersonN. AngelidesH. M. AraújoJ. E. ArmstrongM. ArthursX. BaiJ. BalajthyS. BalashovJ. BangA. BaxterJ. BensingerE. P. BernardA. BernsteinA. BhattiA. BiekertT. P. BiesiadzinskiH. J. BirchK. E. BoastB. BoxerP. BrásJ. H. BuckleyV. V. BugaevS. BurdinJ. K. BusenitzR. CabritaC. CarelsD. L. CarlsmithM. C. Carmona BenitezM. CascellaC. ChanN. I. ChottA. ColeA. CottleJ. E. CutterC. E. DahlL. de ViveirosJ. E. Y. DobsonE. DruszkiewiczT. K. EdbergS. R. EriksenA. FanS. FiorucciH. FlaecherE. D. FraserT. FruthR. J. GaitskellJ. GenovesiC. GhagE. GibsonM. G. D. GilchrieseS. GokhaleM. G. D. van der GrintenC. R. HallA. HarrisonS. J. HaselschwardtS. A. HertelJ. YK. HorM. HornD. Q. HuangC. M. IgnarraO. JahangirW. JiJ. JohnsonA. C. KabothA. C. KamahaK. KamdinK. KazkazD. KhaitanA. KhazovI. KhuranaC. D. KocherL. KorleyE. V. KorolkovaJ. KrasH. KrausS. KravitzL. KreczkoB. KriklerV. A. KudryavtsevE. A. LeasonJ. LeeD. S. LeonardK. T. LeskoC. LevyJ. LiJ. LiaoF. T. LiaoJ. LinA. LindoteR. LinehanW. H. LippincottR. LiuX. LiuC. LoniewskiM. I. LopesB. López ParedesW. LorenzonS. LuitzJ. M. LyleP. A. MajewskiA. ManalaysayL. ManentiR. L. ManninoN. MarangouM. F. MarzioniD. N. McKinseyJ. McLaughlinY. MengE. H. MillerE. MizrachiA. MonteM. E. MonzaniJ. A. MoradE. MorrisonB. J. MountA. St. J. MurphyD. NaimA. NaylorC. NedlikC. NehrkornH. N. NelsonF. NevesJ. A. NikoleyczikA. NilimaK. O'SullivanI. OlcinaK. C. Oliver-MalloryS. PalK. J. PalladinoJ. PalmerN. ParveenE. K. PeaseB. PenningG. PereiraK. PushkinJ. ReichenbacherC. A. RhyneQ. RiffardG. R. C. RischbieterR. RoseroP. RossiterG. RutherfordD. SantoneA. B. M. R. SazzadR. W. SchneeM. SchubnellD. SeymourS. ShawT. A. ShuttJ. J. SilkC. SilvaR. SmithM. SolmazV. N. SolovovP. SorensenI. StancuA. StevensK. StifterT. J. SumnerN. SwansonM. SzydagisM. TanW. C. TaylorR. TaylorD. J. TemplesP. A. TermanD. R. TiedtM. TimalsinaA. TomásM. TripathiD. R. TronstadW. TurnerL. TvrznikovaU. UtkuA. VacheretA. VaitkusJ. J. WangW. WangJ. R. WatsonR. C. WebbR. G. WhiteT. J. WhitisF. L. H. WolfsD. WoodwardX. XiangJ. XuM. YehP. Zarzhitsky

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.