Paper detail

Progress on stochastic analytic continuation of quantum Monte Carlo data

We report multipronged progress on the stochastic averaging approach to numerical analytic continuation of quantum Monte Carlo data. With the sampled spectrum parametrized with delta-functions in continuous frequency space, a calculation of the configurational entropy lends support to a simple goodness-of-fit criterion for the optimal sampling temperature. To further investigate entropic effects, we compare spectra sampled in continuous frequency with results of amplitudes sampled on a fixed frequency grid. We demonstrate equivalences between sampling and optimizing spectral functions with the maximum-entropy approach with different forms of the entropy. These insights revise prevailing notions of the maximum-entropy method and its relationship to stochastic analytic continuation. We further explore various adjustable (optimized) constraints that allow sharp spectral features to be resolved, in particular at the lower frequency edge. The constraints, e.g., the location of the edge or the spectral weight of a quasi-particle peak, are optimized using a statistical criterion. We show that this method can correctly reproduce both narrow and broad quasi-particle peaks. We next introduce a parametrization for more intricate spectral functions with sharp edges, e.g., power-law singularities. Tests with synthetic data as well as with real simulation data for the spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain demonstrate that constrained sampling methods can reproduce spectral functions with sharp edge features at unprecedented fidelity. We present new results for S=1/2 Heisenberg 2-leg and 3-leg ladders to illustrate the ability of the methods to resolve spectral features arising from both elementary and composite excitations. Finally, we also propose how the methods developed here could be used as "pre processors" for analytic continuation by machine learning.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.