Paper detail

Production and decays of a light $ϕ^0$ in the LRTH model under the LHC Higgs data

In this paper we study the production and decays of a light pseudoscalar boson $ϕ^0$ with $m_{ϕ^0} \leq m_h/2$ appeared in the left-right twin Higgs (LRTH) model, and explore its phenomenological consequences when the latest LHC Higgs data are taken into account. We found that (a) the decay rate $Br(h\to ϕ^0ϕ^0)$ can be as large as $80\%$ and can suppress significantly the visible $γγ$ signal rate, but the latest LHC Higgs data put a strong constraint on it: $Br(h \to ϕ^0ϕ^0) \leq 30\%$ at $3σ$ level; (b) the $p$-value of the LRTH model is around $0.6$, smaller than that of the SM in most of the parameter space and approaches the SM value $0.8$ for a sufficiently large $f$ parameter; (c) the neutral pseudoscalar $ϕ^0$ dominantly decay into $b\bar{b}$ and the decay rate $Br(ϕ^0\to b\bar{b})$ can be larger than $80\%$ for $m_{ϕ^0}\leq 60$ GeV, and the second main decay mode is $ϕ^0\to τ^{+}τ^{-}$ with a branching ratio about $14\%$; and (d) at the future $e^-e^+$ collider with $\sqrt{s}=250$ GeV, the processes $e^{+}e^{-}\to Zh\to Z(ϕ^0ϕ^0)\to Z(4b,2b2τ)$ are promising for discovering such a light pseudoscalar $ϕ^0$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.