Paper detail

Production and Decay of 750 Gev state of 6 top and 6 anti top quarks

Crude estimates are made of the branching ratios and pair production cross-section for our previously proposed bound state S of six top and six antitop quarks identified with the diphoton excess recently observed in ATLAS and CMS. We estimate the pair production cross section to be approximately 12 times that for fourth family quarks. Hence we predict $σ(pp \rightarrow SS + anything) \approx 2$ pb at 13 TeV and an increase by a factor 10 over the cross section at 8 TeV. Crude estimates of the main branching ratios relative to the diphoton decay give $Γ(S\rightarrow γ+γ) \propto 1$, $Γ(S\rightarrow t + \bar{t})\propto 378$, $Γ(S \rightarrow gluon+gluon)\propto 117$, $Γ(S\rightarrow Higgs+Higgs)\propto 15$, $Γ(S\rightarrow W+W)\propto 30$ and $Γ(S\rightarrow Z+Z) = 15$. These estimates are consistent with the LHC bounds at 8 TeV within a factor 1.25. We expect the $S \rightarrow γγ$ events to be produced together with another S resonance decaying typically into top-antitop or gluon-gluon jets.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.