Source author record

Colin D. Froggatt

Colin D. Froggatt appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Nano meter Size Dirty Dark Matter Pearls, electron-signal, IMP or SIDM, not WIMP

Through several articles we have developed a model for dark matter as consisting of bubbles of a new (speculated) type of vacuum, starting from cm-sized pearls or balls down to atomic size ones and now we believe they have nanometer sizes. In the latest development of our model we have the bubbles of the new vacuum imbedded in dust grains very similar to the grains present in interstellar and intergalactic space anyway, although the presence of the bubble with a very large homolumo gap in its single electron spectrum influences the dust grain material so as to become denser and harder. We have earlier explained how our dark matter particles get stopped in the shielding, so that normally expected nucleonic collisions are not observable. The signal of the dark matter in the underground experiments rather becomes decays of excited particles actually with the energy of the homolumo gap, which is also equal to the photon energy of the X-ray line presumably observed astronomically from galaxy clusters etc. A new calculation here is a fitting of the velocity dependence of the dark matter self-interaction as estimated by Correa [15], using deviations from the only gravitationally interacting dark matter in dwarf galaxies. Let us stress that apart from the speculated new vacuum we have no new physics, and if the couplings in the Standard Model were adjusted to make degenerate vacua as speculated according to our Multiple Point Principle (MPP) we would only need the Standard Model, so dark matter would not require new physics.

preprint2021arXiv

Dark Matter Macroscopic Pearls, 3.55 keV X-ray line, How big ?

We study the 3.55 keV X-ray suspected to arise from dark matter in our model of dark matter consisting of a bubble of a new phase of the vacuum, the surface tension of which keeps ordinary matter under high pressure inside the bubble. We consider two versions of the model: Old large pearls model : We worked for a long time on a pearl picture with pearl / bubbles of cm-size adjusted so that the impacts of them on earth could be identified with events of the mysterious type that happened in Tunguska in 1908. We fit both the very frequency, the 3.55 keV, and the overall intensity of the X-ray line coming from the center of the Milky Way and from galaxy clusters with one parameter in the model in which this radiation comes from collisions of pearls. New small pearl model: Our latest idea is to let the pearls be smaller than atoms but bigger than nuclei so as to manage to fit the 3.5 keV X-rays coming from the Tycho supernova remnant in which Jeltema and Profumo observed this line. Further we also crudely fit the DAMA-LIBRA observation with the small pearls, and even see a possibility for including the electron-recoil-excess seen by the Xenon1T experiment as being due to de-excitation via electron emission of our pearls. The important point of even our small size pearl model is that the cross section of our "macroscopic" pearls is so large that the pearls interact several times in the shielding but, due to their much larger mass than the typical nuclei, are {\bf not stopped by only a few interactions}. Nevertheless only a minute fraction of the relatively strongly interacting pearls reach the 1400 m down to the DAMA experiment, but due to the higher cross section we can fit the data anyway.

preprint2016arXiv

Dark Matter Balls Help Supernovae to Explode

As a solution to the well-known problem that the shock wave potentially responsible for the explosion of a supernova actually tends to stall, we propose a new energy source arising from our model for dark matter. Our earlier model proposed that dark matter should consist of cm-large white dwarf-like objects kept together by a skin separating two different sorts of vacua. These dark matter balls or pearls will collect in the middle of any star throughout its lifetime. At some stage during the development of a supernova the balls will begin to take in neutrons and then other surrounding material. By passing into a ball nucleons fall through a potential of order 10 MeV, causing a severe production of heat - of order 10 foe for a solar mass of material eaten by the balls. The temperature in the iron core will thereby be raised, splitting up the iron into smaller nuclei. This provides a mechanism for reviving the shock wave when it arrives and making the supernova explosion really occur. The onset of the heating due to the dark matter balls would at first stop the collapse of the supernova progenitor. This opens up the possibility of there being {\em two} collapses giving two neutrino outbursts, as apparently seen in the supernova SN1987A - one in Mont Blanc, and one 4 hours 43 minutes later in both IMB and Kamiokande.

preprint2016arXiv

Production and Decay of 750 Gev state of 6 top and 6 anti top quarks

Crude estimates are made of the branching ratios and pair production cross-section for our previously proposed bound state S of six top and six antitop quarks identified with the diphoton excess recently observed in ATLAS and CMS. We estimate the pair production cross section to be approximately 12 times that for fourth family quarks. Hence we predict $σ(pp \rightarrow SS + anything) \approx 2$ pb at 13 TeV and an increase by a factor 10 over the cross section at 8 TeV. Crude estimates of the main branching ratios relative to the diphoton decay give $Γ(S\rightarrow γ+γ) \propto 1$, $Γ(S\rightarrow t + \bar{t})\propto 378$, $Γ(S \rightarrow gluon+gluon)\propto 117$, $Γ(S\rightarrow Higgs+Higgs)\propto 15$, $Γ(S\rightarrow W+W)\propto 30$ and $Γ(S\rightarrow Z+Z) = 15$. These estimates are consistent with the LHC bounds at 8 TeV within a factor 1.25. We expect the $S \rightarrow γγ$ events to be produced together with another S resonance decaying typically into top-antitop or gluon-gluon jets.