Paper detail

Problems with the perturbative QCD interpretation of HERMES data on semi-inclusive lepto-production of pions

A theoretical analysis has been performed of the HERMES semi-inclusive deep inelastic data on the difference between $π^{+}$ and $π^{-}$ multiplicities. It turns out that the application of a standard perturbative QCD analysis, using, as usual, isospin symmetry for the fragmentation functions, leads to a poor description of the deuteron data at small z values. If one allows a breaking of isospin invariance, a good fit to both proton and deuteron data can be achieved for all measured z, but the level of isospin violation, especially at small values of z, is simply not credible. We suspect that the problem is a consequence of using the factorized QCD treatment in a kinematic region where it is unjustified.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.