Paper detail

Probing Trilinear Higgs Self-coupling at the HL-LHC via Multivariate Analysis

We perform a multivariate analysis of Higgs-pair production in $HH \to b\bar b γγ$ channel at the HL-LHC to probe the trilinear Higgs self--coupling $λ_{3H}$, which takes the value of 1 in the SM. We consider all the known background processes. Also, for the signal we are the first to adopt the most recent event generator of POWHEG-BOX-V2 to exploit the NLO distributions for Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis (TMVA), taking account of the full top--quark mass dependence. Through Boosted Decision Tree (BDT) analysis trained for $λ_{3H}=1$, we find that the significance can reach up to 1.95 with about $9$ signal and $18$ background events. In addition, the Higgs boson self-coupling can be constrained to $1.00 < λ_{3H} < 6.22$ at 95\% confidence level (CL). We also perform a likelihood fitting of $M_{γγbb}$ distribution and find the $1σ$ confidence interval (CI) of $0.1 < λ_{3H} < 2.2\, \cup\,5.4 < λ_{3H} < 6.6$ for the $λ_{3H}=1$ nominal set. On the other hand, using BDTs trained for each value of $λ_{3H}$, we find a bulk region of $0.5 <\sim λ_{3H} <\sim~ 4.5$, for which it is hard to pin down the trilinear coupling.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.