Paper detail

Probing the two-quasiparticle $K^π=8^+$ isomeric structure and enhanced stability in the proton drip-line nuclei

Stimulated by recent experimental discoveries [{Phys. Lett. B \textbf{847}, 138310 (2023)} and {Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{132}, 072502 (2024)}], two-quasiparticle $K^π=8^+$ isomeric structure (related to the neutron $h_{9/2}$ and $f_{7/2}$ orbitals) in $^{160}_{76}$Os$_{84}$ that lies at the two-proton drip line has been studied by means of the configuration-constrained potential-energy-surface calculations. Calculated results indicate that, for such an isomer, the excitation energy can be well reproduced and its oblate shape can be enhanced by the polarization effects of the two high-$K$ orbits. Comparing with experimental data, two sets of the widely used Woods-Saxon parameters, especially, the spin-orbit coupling one, are evaluated and argued. It is found that, considering the uncertainty of the spin-orbit coupling strength, the energy crossing or inversion of the $h_{9/2}$ and $f_{7/2}$ neutrons can occur, which may lead to three kinds of different evolution-trends of two-quasiparticle excitation energies with the changing quadrupole deformation $β_2$. With decreasing spin-orbit coupling interaction, the structure of the $K^π=8^+$ isomeric state will evolute from $νh_{9/2}f_{7/2}$ ($ν9/2^-[505] \otimes 7/2^-[503]$) to the mixing of $νh_{9/2}f_{7/2}$ and $νh_{9/2}^2$ ($ν9/2^-[505] \otimes 7/2^-[514]$) to $νh_{9/2}^2$, indicating that its structural probes is still of interest and an arbitrary assignment may be risky. The related theoretical calculations and experimental evidences e.g., the transition properties, are desirable. In addition, similar to that in superheavy nuclei, it is suggested that the stability inversion between high-$K$ isomeric states and ground states might occur in this proton drip-line mass region, e.g., in the hitherto unknown nucleus $^{162}_{78}$Pt$_{84}$.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.