Paper detail

Probing the LDA-1/2 method as a starting point for $G_0W_0$ calculations

Employing the $G_0W_0$ approximation of Hedin's $GW$ approach one can obtain quasi-particle energies of extended systems and molecules with good accuracy. However, for many materials, semi-local exchange-correlation functionals are unsatisfactory starting points for $G_0W_0$ calculations. Hybrid functionals often improve upon them, but at a substantially higher computational cost. As an alternative, we suggest the LDA-1/2 method, which provides reasonable band gaps, without being computationally involved. In this work, we systematically compare 3 starting points for $G_0W_0$: LDA, PBE0, and LDA-1/2. A selection of solids is chosen for this benchmark: C, Si, SiC, AlP, LiF, MgO, Ne, Ar, GaN, GaAs, CdS, ZnS, and ZnO. We demonstrate that LDA-1/2 is a good starting point in most cases, reducing the mean absolute error of band gaps by 50% when compared to the other 2 functionals.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.