Paper detail

Probing Non-unitary $CP$ Violation effects in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

In the present work, we have considered minimal unitarity violation(MUV) scheme, to obtain the general expression for $ν_μ\rightarrowν_τ$ oscillation probability, in vacuum. For this channel, we have investigated the sensitivities to non-unitary parameters $|ρ_{μτ}|$ and $ω_{μτ}$ with short baseline(SBL) experiments for normal as well as inverted hierarchical neutrino masses. We also check how the sensitivity to non-unitary parameters get modified for $θ_{23}$ above and below maximality. We find that the $3σ$ sensitivity towards $|ρ_{μτ}|$ is maximum for non-unitary phase $ω_{μτ}=0$, whereas it is minimum for $ω_{μτ}=\pmπ$ in case of normal hierarchy(NH). However, the sensitivity is minimum at $ω_{μτ}=0$ and maximum for $ω_{μτ}=\pmπ$ for inverted hierarchy(IH). We observe that for unitary $CP$ phase $δ=0$ and $δ=π/2$, the sensitivity to measure non-unitarity remains same in both the cases. We, also, explore wide range of $L/E$ to forecast, in principle, the possibilities to observe $CP$-violation due to unitary($δ$) and non-unitary($ω_{μτ}$) phases. We find that the both phases can be disentangled, in principle, from each other, for the $L/E$ range less than 200 km/GeV for $ν_μ\rightarrowν_τ$ channel.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.