Paper detail

Probing cosmic isotropy with a new X-ray galaxy cluster sample through the $L_{\text{X}}-T$ scaling relation

The isotropy of the late Universe is an assumption greatly used in astronomy. However, many studies have recently reported deviations from isotropy with a definitive conclusion yet to be made. New, independent methods to robustly test the cosmic isotropy are of crucial importance. In this work, we investigate the directional behavior of the X-ray luminosity-temperature ($L_X-T$) relation of galaxy clusters. A tight correlation exists between the luminosity and temperature of the X-ray-emitting intracluster medium. While the measured luminosity depends on the underlying cosmology, the temperature can be determined without any cosmological assumptions. By exploiting this property one can effectively test the isotropy of cosmological parameters over the full extragalactic sky. Here, we used 313 homogeneously selected X-ray galaxy clusters from the MCXC catalog and obtained core-excised temperatures for all of them. We find that the behavior of the $L_X-T$ relation heavily depends on the direction of the sky. Strong anisotropies are detected at a $\sim 4σ$ level toward $(l,b)\sim (280^{\circ}, -20^{\circ})$. Several X-ray and cluster-related effects that could potentially explain these anisotropies were examined, but none did so. Interestingly, two other available cluster samples appear to have a similar behavior throughout the sky, while being fully independent of each other and our sample. Performing a joint analysis of the three samples, the final anisotropy is further intensified ($\sim 5σ$), toward $(l,b)\sim (303^{\circ}, -27^{\circ})$, which is in good agreement with other cosmological probes. This result demonstrates that X-ray galaxy cluster studies that assume perfect isotropy can produce strongly biased results whether the underlying reason is cosmological or related to X-rays. The identification of the exact nature of these anisotropies is therefore crucial.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.