Researcher profile

G. Schellenberger

G. Schellenberger contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Reducing the background in X-ray imaging detectors via machine learning

The sensitivity of astronomical X-ray detectors is limited by the instrumental background. The background is especially important when observing low surface brightness sources that are critical for many of the science cases targeted by future X-ray observatories, including Athena and future US-led flagship or probe-class X-ray missions. Above 2keV, the background is dominated by signals induced by cosmic rays interacting with the spacecraft and detector. We develop novel machine learning algorithms to identify events in next-generation X-ray imaging detectors and to predict the probability that an event is induced by a cosmic ray vs. an astrophysical X-ray photon, enabling enhanced filtering of the cosmic ray-induced background. We find that by learning the typical correlations between the secondary events that arise from a single primary, machine learning algorithms are able to successfully identify cosmic ray-induced background events that are missed by traditional filtering methods employed on current-generation X-ray missions, reducing the unrejected background by as much as 30 per cent.

preprint2020arXiv

Comparing different mass estimators for a large subsample of the {\it Planck}-ESZ clusters

Total mass is arguably the most fundamental property for cosmological studies with galaxy clusters. We investigate the present differences in the mass estimates obtained through independent X-ray, weak-lensing, and dynamical studies. We quantify the differences as the mean ratio 1-$b$=M$_{\rm HE}$/M$_{\rm WL,dyn}$, where HE refers to hydrostatic masses obtained from X-ray observations, WL refers to the results of weak-lensing measurements, and dyn refers to the mass estimates either from velocity dispersion or from the caustic technique. Recent X-ray masses reported by independent groups show average differences smaller than $\sim$10$\%$, posing a strong limit on the systematics that can be ascribed to the differences in the X-ray analysis when studying the hydrostatic bias. The mean ratio between our X-ray masses and the weak-lensing masses in the LC$^2$-single catalog is 1-$b$=0.74$\pm$0.06. However, the mean mass ratios inferred from the WL masses of different projects vary by a large amount, with APEX-SZ showing a bias consistent with zero (1-$b$=1.02$\pm$0.12), LoCuSS and CCCP/MENeaCS showing a significant difference (1-$b$=0.76$\pm$0.09 and 1-$b$=0.77$\pm$0.10, respectively), and WtG pointing to the largest deviation (1-$b$=0.61$\pm$0.12). At odds with the WL results, the dynamical mass measurements show better agreement with the X-ray hydrostatic masses, although there are significant differences when relaxed or disturbed clusters are used. The different ratios obtained using different mass estimators suggest that there are still systematics that are not accounted for in all the techniques used to recover cluster masses. This prevents the determination of firm constraints on the level of hydrostatic mass bias in galaxy clusters.

preprint2020arXiv

Probing cosmic isotropy with a new X-ray galaxy cluster sample through the $L_{\text{X}}-T$ scaling relation

The isotropy of the late Universe is an assumption greatly used in astronomy. However, many studies have recently reported deviations from isotropy with a definitive conclusion yet to be made. New, independent methods to robustly test the cosmic isotropy are of crucial importance. In this work, we investigate the directional behavior of the X-ray luminosity-temperature ($L_X-T$) relation of galaxy clusters. A tight correlation exists between the luminosity and temperature of the X-ray-emitting intracluster medium. While the measured luminosity depends on the underlying cosmology, the temperature can be determined without any cosmological assumptions. By exploiting this property one can effectively test the isotropy of cosmological parameters over the full extragalactic sky. Here, we used 313 homogeneously selected X-ray galaxy clusters from the MCXC catalog and obtained core-excised temperatures for all of them. We find that the behavior of the $L_X-T$ relation heavily depends on the direction of the sky. Strong anisotropies are detected at a $\sim 4σ$ level toward $(l,b)\sim (280^{\circ}, -20^{\circ})$. Several X-ray and cluster-related effects that could potentially explain these anisotropies were examined, but none did so. Interestingly, two other available cluster samples appear to have a similar behavior throughout the sky, while being fully independent of each other and our sample. Performing a joint analysis of the three samples, the final anisotropy is further intensified ($\sim 5σ$), toward $(l,b)\sim (303^{\circ}, -27^{\circ})$, which is in good agreement with other cosmological probes. This result demonstrates that X-ray galaxy cluster studies that assume perfect isotropy can produce strongly biased results whether the underlying reason is cosmological or related to X-rays. The identification of the exact nature of these anisotropies is therefore crucial.