Paper detail

Probably Approximately Knowing

Whereas deterministic protocols are typically guaranteed to obtain particular goals of interest, probabilistic protocols typically provide only probabilistic guarantees. This paper initiates an investigation of the interdependence between actions and subjective beliefs of agents in a probabilistic setting. In particular, we study what probabilistic beliefs an agent should have when performing actions, in a protocol that satisfies a probabilistic constraint of the form: 'Condition C should hold with probability at least p when action a is performed'. Our main result is that the expected degree of an agent's belief in C when it performs a equals the probability that C holds when a is performed. Indeed, if the threshold of the probabilistic constraint should hold with probaility p=1-x^2 for some small value of x then, with probability 1-x, when the agent acts it will assign a probabilistic belief no smaller than 1-x to the possibility that C holds. In other words, viewing strong belief as, intuitively, approximate knowledge, the agent must probably approximately know (PAK-know) that C is true when it acts.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.