Paper detail

Probability of Collisional Capture of Irregular Satellites Around the Gas Giant Planets and Mass Constraints for the Solar Nebula

We investigated the probability that an inelastic collision of planetesimals within the Hill sphere of the Jovian planets could explain the presence and orbits of observed irregular satellites. Capture of these satellites via this mechanism is highly dependent on not only the mass of the protoplanetary disk, but also the shape of the planetesimal size distribution. We performed 2000 simulations for integrated time intervals $\sim 2$ Myr and found that given the currently accepted value for the minimum mass solar nebula and planetesimal number density based upon the \citet{Bottke2010b} size distribution $dN \sim D^{-1.8} dD$, the collision rates for the different Jovian planets range between $\sim 60$ and $\gtrsim 10^3 \, \Myr^{-1}$ Additionally we found that the probability that these collisions remove enough orbital energy to yield a bound orbit was $\lesssim 10^{-5}$ and had very little dependence on the relative size of the planetesimals. Of these collisions, the collision energy between two masses were $\gtrsim 10^3$ times the gravitational binding energy for masses with radii $\sim 100$ km. Additionally, the combination that enough energy is dissipated by the collision is $\lesssim 10^{-6}$ and the ratio of collision energy to gravitational binding energy is sufficiently large enough to break apart, or completely obliterate, the colliding planetesimals, it is likely that for irregular satellites to be captured as a result of the collision of planetesimals, only a small fraction of the colliding material remained bound to the planet and would most likely be produced by a large mass with a radius $\sim 100$ km colliding with a smaller mass with radius $\lesssim 20$ km.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.