Source author record

F. Elliott Koch

F. Elliott Koch appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

The Anglo-Australian Planet Search. XXIII. Two New Jupiter Analogs

We report the discovery of two long-period giant planets from the Anglo-Australian Planet Search. HD 154857c is in a multiple-planet system, while HD 114613b appears to be solitary. HD 114613b has an orbital period P=10.5 years, and a minimum mass m sin i of 0.48 Jupiter masses; HD 154857c has P=9.5 years and m sin i=2.6 Jupiter masses. These new data confirm the planetary nature of the previously unconstrained long-period object in the HD 154857 system. We have performed detailed dynamical stability simulations which show that the HD 154857 two-planet system is stable on timescales of at least 100 million years. These results highlight the continued importance of "legacy" surveys with long observational baselines; these ongoing campaigns are critical for determining the population of Jupiter analogs, and hence of those planetary systems with architectures most like our own Solar system.

preprint2013arXiv

Capturing Trojans and Irregular Satellites - the key required to unlock planetary migration

It is now accepted that the Solar system's youth was a dynamic and chaotic time. The giant planets migrated significant distances to reach their current locations, and evidence of that migration's influence on the Solar system abounds. That migration's pace, and the distance over which it occurred, is still heavily debated. Some models feature systems in which the giant planets were initially in an extremely compact configuration, in which Uranus and Neptune are chaotically scattered into the outer Solar system. Others feature architectures that were initially more relaxed, and smoother, more sedate migration. To determine which of these scenarios best represents the formation of our Solar system, we must turn to the structure of the system's small body populations, in which the scars of that migration are still clearly visible. We present the first results of a program investigating the effect of giant planet migration on the reservoirs of small bodies that existed at that time. As the planets migrate, they stir these reservoirs, scattering vast numbers of small bodies onto dynamically unstable orbits in the outer Solar system. The great majority of those bodies are rapidly removed from the system, through collisions and ejections, but a small number become captured as planetary Trojans or irregular satellites. Others are driven by the migration, leading to a significant sculpting of the asteroid belt and trans-Neptunian region. The capture and retention efficiencies to these stable reservoirs depend on the particular migration scenario used. Advocates of chaotic migration from an initially compact scenario argue that smoother, more sedate migration cannot explain the observed populations of Trojans and irregular satellites. Our results draw a strikingly different picture, revealing that such smooth migration is perfectly capable of reproducing the observed populations.

preprint2012arXiv

Can Effects of Dark Matter be Explained by the Turbulent Flow of Spacetime?

For the past forty years the search for dark matter has been one of the primary foci of astrophysics, although there has yet to be any direct evidence for its existence (Porter et al. 2011). Indirect evidence for the existence of dark matter is largely rooted in the rotational speeds of stars within their host galaxies, where, instead of having a ~ r^1/2 radial dependence, stars appear to have orbital speeds independent of their distance from the galactic center, which led to proposed existence of dark matter (Porter et al. 2011; Peebles 1993). We propose an alternate explanation for the observed stellar motions within galaxies, combining the standard treatment of a fluid-like spacetime with the possibility of a "bulk flow" of mass through the Universe. The differential "flow" of spacetime could generate vorticies capable of providing the "perceived" rotational speeds in excess of those predicted by Newtonian mechanics. Although a more detailed analysis of our theory is forthcoming, we find a crude "order of magnitude" calculation can explain this phenomena. We also find that this can be used to explain the graviational lensing observed around globular clusters like "Bullet Cluster".

preprint2012arXiv

Probability of Collisional Capture of Irregular Satellites Around the Gas Giant Planets and Mass Constraints for the Solar Nebula

We investigated the probability that an inelastic collision of planetesimals within the Hill sphere of the Jovian planets could explain the presence and orbits of observed irregular satellites. Capture of these satellites via this mechanism is highly dependent on not only the mass of the protoplanetary disk, but also the shape of the planetesimal size distribution. We performed 2000 simulations for integrated time intervals $\sim 2$ Myr and found that given the currently accepted value for the minimum mass solar nebula and planetesimal number density based upon the \citet{Bottke2010b} size distribution $dN \sim D^{-1.8} dD$, the collision rates for the different Jovian planets range between $\sim 60$ and $\gtrsim 10^3 \, \Myr^{-1}$ Additionally we found that the probability that these collisions remove enough orbital energy to yield a bound orbit was $\lesssim 10^{-5}$ and had very little dependence on the relative size of the planetesimals. Of these collisions, the collision energy between two masses were $\gtrsim 10^3$ times the gravitational binding energy for masses with radii $\sim 100$ km. Additionally, the combination that enough energy is dissipated by the collision is $\lesssim 10^{-6}$ and the ratio of collision energy to gravitational binding energy is sufficiently large enough to break apart, or completely obliterate, the colliding planetesimals, it is likely that for irregular satellites to be captured as a result of the collision of planetesimals, only a small fraction of the colliding material remained bound to the planet and would most likely be produced by a large mass with a radius $\sim 100$ km colliding with a smaller mass with radius $\lesssim 20$ km.

preprint2011arXiv

On collisional capture rates of irregular satellites around the gas-giant planets and the minimum mass of the solar nebula

We investigated the probability that an inelastic collision of planetesimals within the Hill sphere of the Jovian planets could explain the presence and orbits of observed irregular satellites. Capture of satellites via this mechanism is highly dependent on not only the mass of the protoplanetary disk, but also the shape of the planetesimal size distribution. We performed 2000 simulations for integrated time intervals $\sim 2$ Myr and found that, given the currently accepted value for the minimum mass solar nebula and planetesimal number density based upon the \citet{Nesvorny2003} and \citet{Charnoz2003} size distribution $dN \sim D^{-3.5} dD$, the collision rates for the different Jovian planets range between $\sim 0.6$ and $\gtrsim 170 \, \Myr^{-1}$ for objects with radii, $1 \, \km \le r \le 10 \, \km$. Additionally, we found that the probability that these collisions remove enough orbital energy to yield a bound orbit was $\lesssim 10^{-5}$ and had very little dependence on the relative size of the planetesimals. Of these collisions, the collision energy between two objects was $\gtrsim 10^3$ times the gravitational binding energy for objects with radii $\sim 100$ km. We find that, capturing irregular satellites via collisions between unbound objects can only account for $\sim 0.1%$ of the observed population, hence can this not be the sole method of producing irregular satellites.