Paper detail

Probability and Non-Probability Samples: Improving Regression Modeling by Using Data from Different Sources

Non-probability sampling, for example in the form of online panels, has become a fast and cheap method to collect data. While reliable inference tools are available for classical probability samples, non-probability samples can yield strongly biased estimates since the selection mechanism is typically unknown. We propose a general method how to improve statistical inference when in addition to a probability sample data from other sources, which have to be considered non-probability samples, are available. The method uses specifically tailored regression residuals to enlarge the original data set by including observations from other sources that can be considered as stemming from the target population. Measures of accuracy of estimates are obtained by adapted bootstrap techniques. It is demonstrated that the method can improve estimates in a wide range of scenarios. For illustrative purposes, the proposed method is applied to two data sets.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.