Paper detail

Probabilistic constructions in continuous combinatorics and a bridge to distributed algorithms

The probabilistic method is a technique for proving combinatorial existence results by means of showing that a randomly chosen object has the desired properties with positive probability. A particularly powerful probabilistic tool is the Lovász Local Lemma (the LLL for short), which was introduced by Erdős and Lovász in the mid-1970s. Here we develop a version of the LLL that can be used to prove the existence of continuous colorings. We then give several applications in Borel and topological dynamics. * Seward and Tucker-Drob showed that every free Borel action $Γ\curvearrowright X$ of a countable group $Γ$ admits an equivariant Borel map $π\colon X \to Y$ to a free subshift $Y \subset 2^Γ$. We give a new simple proof of this result. * We show that for a countable group $Γ$, $\mathrm{Free}(2^Γ)$ is weakly contained, in the sense of Elek, in every free continuous action of $Γ$ on a zero-dimensional Polish space. This fact is analogous to the theorem of Abért and Weiss for probability measure-preserving actions and has a number of consequences in continuous combinatorics. In particular, we deduce that a coloring problem admits a continuous solution on $\mathrm{Free}(2^Γ)$ if and only if it can be solved on finite subgraphs of the Cayley graph of $Γ$ by an efficient deterministic distributed algorithm (this fact was also proved independently and using different methods by Seward). This establishes a formal correspondence between questions that have been studied independently in continuous combinatorics and in distributed computing.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.