Paper detail

Principal factors and lattice minima

Let $\mathit{k}=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{d},ζ_3)$, where $d>1$ is a cube-free positive integer, $\mathit{k}_0=\mathbb{Q}(ζ_3)$ be the cyclotomic field containing a primitive cube root of unity $ζ_3$, and $G=\operatorname{Gal}(\mathit{k}/\mathit{k}_0)$. The possible prime factorizations of $d$ in our main result [2, Thm. 1.1] give rise to new phenomena concerning the chain $Θ=(θ_i)_{i\in\mathbb{Z}}$ of \textit{lattice minima} in the underlying pure cubic subfield $L=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{d})$ of $\mathit{k}$. The aims of the present work are to give criteria for the occurrence of generators of primitive ambiguous principal ideals $(α)\in\mathcal{P}_{\mathit{k}}^G/\mathcal{P}_{\mathit{k}_0}$ among the lattice minima $Θ=(θ_i)_{i\in\mathbb{Z}}$ of the underlying pure cubic field $L=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{d})$, and to explain exceptional behavior of the chain $Θ$ for certain radicands $d$ with impact on determining the principal factorization type of $L$ and $\mathit{k}$ by means of Voronoi's algorithm.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.