Paper detail

Pressure evolution of low-temperature crystal structure and bonding of 37 K $T_c$ FeSe superconductor

FeSe with the PbO structure is a key member of the family of new high-$T_c$ iron pnictide and chalcogenide superconductors, as while it possesses the basic layered structural motif of edge-sharing distorted FeSe$_4$ tetrahedra, it lacks interleaved ion spacers or charge-reservoir layers. We find that application of hydrostatic pressure first rapidly increases $T_c$ which attains a broad maximum of 37 K at $\sim$7 GPa (this is one of the highest $T_c$ ever reported for a binary solid) before decreasing to 6 K upon further compression to $\sim$14 GPa. Complementary synchrotron X-ray diffraction at 16 K was used to measure the low-temperature isothermal compressibility of $α$-FeSe, revealing an extremely soft solid with a bulk modulus, $K_0$ = 30.7(1.1) GPa and strong bonding anisotropy between inter- and intra-layer directions that transforms to the more densely packed $β$-polymorph above $\sim$9 GPa. The non-monotonic $T_c$($P$) behavior of FeSe coincides with drastic anomalies in the pressure evolution of the interlayer spacing, pointing to the key role of this structural feature in modulating the electronic properties.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.