Paper detail

Present Velocity and Acceleration in Tide Gauge Records Characterized by a Quasi-60 years Periodic Oscillation

The paper describing sea level rise oscillations at Cape Hatteras, USA by Parker [1] has opened the discussion regarding if the velocity in a tide gauge record characterized by a quasi-60-year multi-decadal oscillation can be computed by linear fitting of 30 years of data in two ad-hoc selected times and if acceleration can then be inferred by comparing these two values as proposed by Sallenger [2], or if this comparison is meaningless in that the 60-year time window is the minimum amount of time needed to evaluate the velocity in a record characterized by a quasi-60-year multi-decadal oscillation and the acceleration has then to be computed as the time derivative of this velocity as suggested by Parker [1,3]. For the specific case of The Battery, NY, it is shown here that the 60-year time window is the minimum time length needed to compute a velocity, and both the 60-year windows and the all data velocities are free of any acceleration at the present time. The 30-year time window velocity of 2009 is not representative of the present sea level rise and the comparison of the 30-year time window velocity of 2009 and 1979 near a peak and a valley, respectively, of the 60-year multidecadal oscillation to claim a present acceleration has no scientific background.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.