Paper detail

Preliminary test of time-convolutionless mode-coupling theory based on the Percus-Yevick static structure factor for hard spheres

In order to investigate how the time-convolutionless mode-coupling theory (TMCT) recently proposed by Tokuyama can improve the critical point predicted by the ideal mode-coupling theory (MCT), the TMCT equations are numerically solved based on the Percus-Yevick static structure factor for hard spheres as a preliminary test. Then, the full numerical solutions are compared with those of MCT for different physical quantities, such as intermediate scattering functions and diffusion coefficients. Thus, the ergodic to nonergodic transition predicted by MCT is also found at the critical volume fraction $ϕ_c$ which is higher than that of MCT. Here $ϕ_c$ is given by $ϕ_c\simeq 0.5817$ at $q_cσ_d=40$ and 0.5856 at $q_cσ_d=20$ for TMCT, while $ϕ_c\simeq 0.5159$ at $q_cσ_d=40$ and 0.5214 at $q_cσ_d=20$ for MCT, where $q_c$ is a cutoff of wave vector and $σ_d$ a particle diameter. The same two-step relaxation process as that predicted by MCT is also discussed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.