Paper detail

PReGAN: Answer Oriented Passage Ranking with Weakly Supervised GAN

Beyond topical relevance, passage ranking for open-domain factoid question answering also requires a passage to contain an answer (answerability). While a few recent studies have incorporated some reading capability into a ranker to account for answerability, the ranker is still hindered by the noisy nature of the training data typically available in this area, which considers any passage containing an answer entity as a positive sample. However, the answer entity in a passage is not necessarily mentioned in relation with the given question. To address the problem, we propose an approach called \ttt{PReGAN} for Passage Reranking based on Generative Adversarial Neural networks, which incorporates a discriminator on answerability, in addition to a discriminator on topical relevance. The goal is to force the generator to rank higher a passage that is topically relevant and contains an answer. Experiments on five public datasets show that \ttt{PReGAN} can better rank appropriate passages, which in turn, boosts the effectiveness of QA systems, and outperforms the existing approaches without using external data.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.