Paper detail

Prediction of tubular solar still performance by machine learning integrated with Bayesian optimization algorithm

Presented is a new generation prediction model of a tubular solar still (TSS) productivity utilizing two machine learning (ML) techniques, namely:Random forest (RF) and Artificial neural network (ANN). Prediction models were conducted based on experimental data recorded under Egyptian climate. Meteorological and operational thermal parameters were utilized as input layers. Moreover, Bayesian optimization algorithm (BOA) was used to obtain the optimal performance of RF and ANN models. In addition, these models results were compared to those of a multilinear regression (MLR) model. As resulted, experimentally, the average value accumulated productivity was 4.3 L/(m2day). For models results, RF was less sensitive to hyper parameters than ANN as ANN performance could be significantly improved by BOA more than RF. In addition, RF achieved better prediction performance of TSS on the current dataset. The determination coefficients (R2) of RF and ANN were 0.9964 and 0.9977, respectively, which were much higher than MLR models, 0.9431. Based on the robustness performance and high accuracy, RF is recommended as a stable method for predicting the productivity of TSS.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.