Paper detail

Prediction of Li intercalation voltages in rechargeable battery cathode materials: effects of exchange-correlation functional, van der Waals interactions, and Hubbard $U$

Quantitative predictions of the Li intercalation voltage and of the electronic properties of rechargeable battery cathode materials are a substantial challenge for first-principles theory due to the possibility of (1) strong correlations associated with localized transition metal $d$ electrons and (2) significant van der Waals (vdW) interactions in layered systems, both of which are not accurately captured by standard approximations to density functional theory (DFT). Here, we perform a systematic benchmark of electronic structure methods based on the widely-used generalized gradient approximation of Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) and the new strongly constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) meta-generalized gradient approximation for battery cathode materials. Studying layered Li$_x$TiS$_2$, Li$_x$NiO$_2$, and Li$_x$CoO$_2$, olivine Li$_x$FePO$_4$, and spinel Li$_x$Mn$_2$O$_4$, we compute the voltage, crystal structure, and electronic structure with and without extensions to incorporate on-site Hubbard interactions and vdW interactions. Within pure DFT (i.e., without corrections for on-site Hubbard interactions), SCAN is a significant improvement over PBE for describing cathode materials, decreasing the mean absolute voltage error by more than 50%. Although explicit vdW interactions are not critical and in cases even detrimental when applied in conjunction with SCAN, Hubbard $U$ corrections are still in general necessary to achieve reasonable agreement with experiment. We show that no single method considered here can accurately describe the voltage and overall structural, electronic, and magnetic properties (i.e., errors no more than 5% for voltage, volume, band gap, and magnetic moments) of battery cathode materials, motivating a strong need for improved electronic structure approaches for such systems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.