Paper detail

Predicting the probability distribution of bus travel time to move towards reliable planning of public transport services

An important aspect of the quality of a public transport service is its reliability, which is defined as the invariability of the service attributes. Preventive measures taken during planning can reduce risks of unreliability throughout operations. In order to tackle reliability during the service planning phase, a key piece of information is the long-term prediction of the density of the travel time, which conveys the uncertainty of travel times. We introduce a reliable approach to one of the problems of service planning in public transport, namely the Multiple Depot Vehicle Scheduling Problem (MDVSP), which takes as input a set of trips and the probability density function (p.d.f.) of the travel time of each trip in order to output delay-tolerant vehicle schedules. This work empirically compares probabilistic models for the prediction of the conditional p.d.f. of the travel time, as a first step towards reliable MDVSP solutions. Two types of probabilistic models, namely similarity-based density estimation models and a smoothed Logistic Regression for probabilistic classification model, are compared on a dataset of more than 41,000 trips and 50 bus routes of the city of Montréal. The result of a vast majority of probabilistic models outperforms that of a Random Forests model, which is not inherently probabilistic, thus highlighting the added value of modeling the conditional p.d.f. of the travel time with probabilistic models. A similarity-based density estimation model using a $k$ Nearest Neighbors method and a Kernel Density Estimation predicted the best estimate of the true conditional p.d.f. on this dataset.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.