Paper detail

Predicting Ligand-Dissociation Energies of 3d Coordination Complexes with Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo

Transition metal complexes are ubiquitous in biology and chemical catalysis, yet they remain difficult to accurately describe with ab initio methods due to the presence of a large degree of dynamic electron correlation, and, in some cases, strong static correlation which results from a manifold of low-lying states. Progress has been hindered by a scarcity of high quality gas-phase experimental data, while exact ab initio predictions are usually computationally unaffordable due to the large size of the systems. In this work, we present a data set of 34 3d metal-containing complexes with gas-phase ligand-dissociation energies that have reported uncertainties of $\leq$ 2 kcal/mol. We perform all-electron phaseless auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (ph-AFQMC) utilizing multi-determinant trial wavefunctions selected by a blackbox procedure. We compare the results with those from DFT with various functionals, and DLPNO-CCSD(T). We find MAE of 1.09 $\pm$ 0.28 kcal/mol for our best ph-AFQMC method, vs 2.89 kcal/mol for DLPNO-CCSD(T) and 1.57 - 3.87 kcal/mol for DFT. We find maximum errors of 2.96 $\pm$ 1.71 kcal/mol for our best ph-AFQMC method, vs 9.15 kcal/mol for DLPNO-CCSD(T) and 5.98 - 13.69 kcal/mol for DFT. The reasonable performance of several functionals is in stark contrast to the much poorer accuracy previously demonstrated for diatomics, suggesting a moderation in electron correlation due to ligand coordination. However, the unpredictably large errors for a small subset of cases with both DFT and DLPNO-CCSD(T) leave cause for concern, especially due to the unreliability of common multi-reference indicators. In contrast, the robust and, in principle, systematically improvable results of ph-AFQMC for these realistic complexes establish it as a useful tool for elucidating the electronic structure of transition metal-containing complexes and predicting their gas-phase properties.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.