Paper detail

Predict the water level of the Lake Mead for the next 30 years based on ARIMA

In this study, a mathematical model is developed for the drought problem of Lake Mead. First, a polynomial fitting of the elevation of Lake Mead to the area of the lake is done by the least-squares method, and the volume of Lake Mead is approximated by the numerical integration of the product of the height and the area solved by the trapezoidal rule. The accuracy of the fitting reached more than 96%at all four different locations. Second, the minimum and maximum water levels were transformed into volume numbers by the above method, and the historical data of Lake Mead were classified into three classes of water resources by sequential clustering. According to these data, the optimal cut point of the most recent drought period was 2008 and has continued until now. Finally, two prediction models were constructed using ARIMA(2,2,2) and ARIMA(3,2,2) to study the water level data from 2008 to 2020 and 2005 to 2020, respectively, to predict the water level data of Lake Mead from 2022 to 2050, and to compare and analyze them.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.