Paper detail

Precise Error Analysis of Regularized M-estimators in High-dimensions

A popular approach for estimating an unknown signal from noisy, linear measurements is via solving a so called \emph{regularized M-estimator}, which minimizes a weighted combination of a convex loss function and of a convex (typically, non-smooth) regularizer. We accurately predict the squared error performance of such estimators in the high-dimensional proportional regime. The random measurement matrix is assumed to have entries iid Gaussian, only minimal and rather mild regularity conditions are imposed on the loss function, the regularizer, and on the noise and signal distributions. We show that the error converges in probability to a nontrivial limit that is given as the solution to a minimax convex-concave optimization problem on four scalar optimization variables. We identify a new summary parameter, termed the Expected Moreau envelope to play a central role in the error characterization. The \emph{precise} nature of the results permits an accurate performance comparison between different instances of regularized M-estimators and allows to optimally tune the involved parameters (e.g. regularizer parameter, number of measurements). The key ingredient of our proof is the \emph{Convex Gaussian Min-max Theorem} (CGMT) which is a tight and strengthened version of a classical Gaussian comparison inequality that was proved by Gordon in 1988.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.