Paper detail

Power and Performance Analysis of Persistent Key-Value Stores

With the current rate of data growth, processing needs are becoming difficult to fulfill due to CPU power and energy limitations. Data serving systems and especially persistent key-value stores have become a substantial part of data processing stacks in the data center, providing access to massive amounts of data for applications and services. Key-value stores exhibit high CPU and I/O overheads because of their constant need to reorganize data on the devices. In this paper, we examine the efficiency of two key-value stores on four servers of different generations and with different CPU architectures. We use RocksDB, a key-value that is deployed widely, e.g. in Facebook, and Kreon, a research key-value store that has been designed to reduce CPU overhead. We evaluate their behavior and overheads on an ARM-based microserver and three different generations of x86 servers. Our findings show that microservers have better power efficiency in the range of 0.68-3.6x with a comparable tail latency.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.