Paper detail

Potts-model critical manifolds revisited

We compute the critical polymials for the q-state Potts model on all Archimedean lattices, using a parallel implementation of the algorithm of (Jacobsen, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47 135001) that gives us access to larger sizes than previously possible. The exact polynomials are computed for bases of size $6 \times 6$ unit cells, and the root in the temperature variable $v=e^K-1$ is determined numerically at $q=1$ for bases of size $8 \times 8$. This leads to improved results for bond percolation thresholds, and for the Potts-model critical manifolds in the real $(q,v)$ plane. In the two most favourable cases, we find now the kagome-lattice threshold to eleven digits and that of the $(3,12^2)$ lattice to thirteen. Our critical manifolds reveal many interesting features in the antiferromagnetic region of the Potts model, and determine accurately the extent of the Berker-Kadanoff phase for the lattices studied.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.