Paper detail

Posterior Concentration Properties of a General Class of Shrinkage Priors around Nearly Black Vectors

Suppose we have data generated according to a multivariate normal distribution with a fixed unknown mean vector that is sparse in the sense of being nearly black. Optimality of Bayes estimates and posterior concentration properties in terms of the minimax risk in the $l_2$ norm corresponding to a very general class of continuous shrinkage priors are studied in this work. The class of priors considered is rich enough to include a great variety of heavy tailed prior distributions, such as, the three parameter beta normal mixtures (including the horseshoe), the generalized double Pareto, the inverse gamma and the normal-exponential-gamma priors. Assuming that the number of non-zero components of the mean vector is known, we show that the Bayes estimators corresponding to this general class of priors attain the minimax risk in the $l_2$ norm (possibly up to a multiplicative constant) and the corresponding posterior distributions contract around the true mean vector at the minimax optimal rate for appropriate choice of the global shrinkage parameter. Moreover, we provide conditions for which these posterior distributions contract around the corresponding Bayes estimates at least as fast as the minimax risk in the $l_2$ norm. We also provide a lower bound to the total posterior variance for an important subclass of this general class of shrinkage priors that includes the generalized double Pareto priors with shape parameter $α=0.5$ and the three parameter beta normal mixtures with parameters $a=0.5$ and $b>0$ (including the horseshoe) in particular. The present work is inspired by the recent work of van der Pas et al. (2014) on the posterior contraction properties of the horseshoe prior under the present set-up. We extend their results for this general class of priors and come up with novel unifying proofs which work for a very broad class of one-group continuous shrinkage priors.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.