Paper detail

Post-processing output from ensembles with and without parametrised convection, to create accurate, blended, high-fidelity rainfall forecasts

Flash flooding is a significant societal problem, but related precipitation forecasts are often poor. To address this, one can try to use output from convection-parametrising (global) ensembles, post-processed to forecast at point-scale, or convection-resolving limited area ensembles. In this study, we combine both. First, we apply the "ecPoint-rainfall" post-processing to the ECMWF global ensemble. Then, we use 2.2km COSMO LAM ensemble output (centred on Italy), and also post-process it using a scale-selective neighbourhood approach to compensate for insufficient members. The two components then undergo lead-time-weighted blending, to create the final probabilistic 6h rainfall forecasts. Product creation for forecasters constituted the "Italy Flash Flood use case" within the EU-funded MISTRAL project and it will be a real-time open-access product. One year of verification shows that ecPoint is the most skilful ensemble product. The post-processed COSMO ensemble adds most value to summer convective events in the evening, when the global model has an underprediction bias. In two heavy rainfall case studies we observed underestimation of the largest point totals in the raw ECMWF ensemble, and overestimation in the raw COSMO ensemble. However, ecPoint increase the value and highlighted best the most affected areas, whilst post-processing of COSMO diminished extremes by eradicating unreliable detail. The final merged products looked best from a user perspective and seemed to be the most skilful of all. Although our LAM post-processing does not implicitly include bias correction (a topic for further work) our study nonetheless provides a unique blueprint for successfully combining ensemble rainfall forecasts from global and LAM systems around the world. It also has important implications for forecast products as global ensembles move ever closer to having convection-permitting resolution.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.