Paper detail

POPO: Pessimistic Offline Policy Optimization

Offline reinforcement learning (RL), also known as batch RL, aims to optimize policy from a large pre-recorded dataset without interaction with the environment. This setting offers the promise of utilizing diverse, pre-collected datasets to obtain policies without costly, risky, active exploration. However, commonly used off-policy algorithms based on Q-learning or actor-critic perform poorly when learning from a static dataset. In this work, we study why off-policy RL methods fail to learn in offline setting from the value function view, and we propose a novel offline RL algorithm that we call Pessimistic Offline Policy Optimization (POPO), which learns a pessimistic value function to get a strong policy. We find that POPO performs surprisingly well and scales to tasks with high-dimensional state and action space, comparing or outperforming several state-of-the-art offline RL algorithms on benchmark tasks.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.